Featured: Adventures in Chaos| Nearly Wed| No-Obligation Book Club
Categories: Food & Recipes| Home & Organizing| Beauty & Fashion| Holidays & Entertaining| Health| Work & Life| Technology


Organizing
Studying economics to help get rid of clutter
Posted on Jun 10, 2008 7:30:00 AM  |  By ErinDoland

080326money When clients tell me that they are having difficulty getting rid of clutter, I ask the following questions:

Have you ever gone to the movie theater and seen a really bad movie? If so, did you leave the theater before the movie was finished?

To date, the responses have always been "yes" to the first question and "no" to the second. The justifications are usually that they paid money for the tickets, so they stayed for the whole movie.

The same explanation is used by a lot of people when they decide to hold onto their clutter. They find it difficult to part with an object because they "paid good money for it." I have definitely fallen prey to this line of reasoning -- especially when computer equipment is involved.

The idea that we paid money for an object (or experience, as with the movie) is not a valid reason to hold onto something, however. The money has already been spent. We can't go back in time and unmake a purchase no matter how much we all would like to. Therefore, letting an object's purchase price be part of our decision to keep it in the future is irrational. We've stopped evaluating the current merits of the object and are instead evaluating costs we can't recoup. This line of thinking is so prevalent that it is studied in economics and is called the sunk cost fallacy.

Simply stated, if you don't have use for an object, then the real value of that object to you is zero -- not what was spent on it when you bought it. You don't need it and you don't really want it. Instead of holding onto it, you should consider donating the object to charity or selling it to someone who places a higher value on the object than you do. I enjoy knowing that something I once enjoyed has been set free into the world to be valued by someone else (or at least that's what I tell myself when I part with the clutter).

Reminding ourselves about the sunk cost fallacy is one way to get past the "but I paid a lot of money for it" excuse for holding onto things we no longer value or need. Although it's a difficult task, it can be helpful when tackling an uncluttering project to keep in mind the current value of an object, not its purchase price.



Digg This! | Stumble It! | Add to KiRTSY | Save to del.icio.us | Email this post



Post Your Comment:
Terms of Service

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In
















If you watch my very first episode of Mission:Organization, (#503) you'll see me sitting on the floor, working with a homeowner who is struggling with letting go of old business cards because she paid a lot of money for them. She is struggling, even though the cards were of no use -- they had her OLD address on them.

I told her on camera what I tell all my clients (off-camera)... Keeping the THING just because of the amount of money you paid for it, DOESN'T BRING THE MONEY BACK. In fact, it's worse than that, because every time you see the THING, it just reminds you over and over again that the money is gone and creates a feeling of guilt. Great post!
~Monica

Posted by: Monica Ricci| June 10, 2008 at 09:20 AM




Great post- it puts a whole new light on clutter- a monetary light that we all can relate to. Its my goal this summer to minmize and de-clutter, so I now have another reason to do so. A little extra money in my pocket would also not hurt.

Posted by: Tracey| June 10, 2008 at 12:33 PM




I have finally convinced myself to let go of things that have no real value because I no longer use them. My problem now is that if something cost me a lot of money, I feel I need to recoup some of that cost through eBay or something similar. Then the clutter hangs around waiting for me to list it. And if it doesn't sell, then what? I really need to work on letting go and getting rid of the stuff altogether.

Posted by: Journeyer| June 11, 2008 at 07:50 AM




This is such a fabulous post. I couldn't agree more and am embarassed enough to say that my home currently is stuffed to the gills with furniture I have inherited. We are getting rid of this furniture by selling it online (one piece down, a few more to go) in the hopes of making a little money. But this is a great reminder that truly, if no one wants to buy it, let's just donate it and get it out of our space. I can't wait! Thanks for this reminder!

www.superiorhabitat.wordpress.com

Posted by: Ms. Superiority| June 11, 2008 at 08:48 AM




Nice to know there is a name for my nurosis ;-)

Posted by: Jesse| June 11, 2008 at 04:05 PM




When I'm going through the decluttering process I always ask myself "would I pay for it now?" if the answer is no. It goes. I've thought about setting a value - even as low as 50p per item and if I want to keep it I have to pay that money (to a charity maybe?)

Posted by: Emma| June 12, 2008 at 06:44 AM




Brilliant!

Posted by: Beth| June 23, 2008 at 12:20 PM




I have a tendency to use this excuse, but I have found a good way of dealing with it (for me anyway). I don't get rid of it right away, but I do put it out of the way so that I do not see it for a while. After I have been removed from the item for a while, I am better able to look at it more objectively and make a decision about getting rid of it (which I usually do!)

Posted by: Leslie| June 24, 2008 at 04:12 PM






Subscribe

Enter your email address to get updates:

Get the RSS feed
Subscribe by Category


Previously on Simply Stated


Advertisement




Search Simply Stated




Contributors

Archives

Advertisement

Sites We Like


Featured in Alltop